top of page

SOCKET SHIELDING IMMEDIATE IMPLANT USING NEOBIOTECH IS-II ACTIVE FIXTURE

Updated: Sep 7, 2021

Introduction

- Loss of blood supply from periodontal ligament has been identified as major etiology for ridge resorption (KOTSAKIS 2014)

- In Implant-Biologic interphase, There is lack of blood supply

- Gradual degradation of Peri-implant tissue, Difficulty to maintain tissue volume and integrity.

- Ridge preservation techniques limit but do not prevent ridge resorption.

- Biologic ratio of Supra-Implant mucosa (NOZAWA 2006)

- Vertical : Horizontal = 1 : 1.5

-No differences in biologic width to height ratio in terms of Implant diameter

- Stable buccal cervical line around Implant supra-structure can be achieved if the ratio is maintained

- Cementum and PDL : The secret of natural teeth's beauty and functional maintenance

- Socket shielding technique started of as an "Extension" of root submerging technique

- Root submergence preserve the periodontal architecture of pontic site

- Blood supply of buccal plate was never disturbed

-Technique such as socket shielding / Root membrane / Partial extraction therapy technique was introduced to reduce long term Peri-Implant tissue volume loss

- Hurzeler 2013 published the first histological, clinical and volumetrics study on the socket shield technique

- Histology shoes healthy periodontal ligament on buccal side of root with new bone between Implant and root shield

- This technique might help preserve labial bone of Implant


Indication

1. All indications of Immediate Implant

2. Horizontal fracture teeth up to bone level

3. Ankylotic teeth

4. Placing Immediate Implant adjacent to an existing Implant (KAN 2013, CHEREL 2014)

Contraindication

1. Periodontally compromised teeth

2. Vertical root fracture

3. Acute inflammation

Patient Information

- 22 years old, Male

- PMH : Medically fit without any known allergies, Non- smokers

- PDH : Root canal treatment done on 21

- Chief Complain : Fracture tooth No. 11 and discolored tooth No. 21

- Diagnosis : 11 Carious induced fracture with lesion extending to cervical of tooth

21 internal stain after root canal treatment



Treatment Plan

1. Immediate Extraction with socket shielding technique to preserve labial tissue dimension

2. Tooth 21 to be treated with internal bleaching and full ceramic crown restoration



ree

Low lip Smile



ree

Close-up View






Pre-operative Intra-oral Photograph



ree

Pre-operative Panorama



ree

Decoronation of tooth and caries removal



ree

Tooth split with high speed handpiece



ree

Palatal root fragment removed.



ree

Extracted root



ree

Re-adjust labial root height



ree

Final position just at crestal bone height



ree

Neobiotech IS-II Implant was placed more palatally giving sufficient jumping distance



ree

Less than 20Ncm torque was achieved.

Implant was not immediately loaded.


ree

A small healing abutment was placed to allow more soft tissue to grow.

Regenoss allograft was used to fill the jumping distance.


ree

Collagen fleece was used to cover on top of the extraction socket.



ree

Post-operative photograph (Frontal View)



ree

Provisional with essix retained with acrylic tooth



ree

Post-operative panorama



ree
ree

3 Months post-operative photograph



ree
ree

Impression for provisional



ree

Provisional Crown

- Larger healing abutment to push out soft tissue


ree

- Provisional crown in place, Internal bleaching on 21



ree

Final Impression

- Gingiva level on 11 was still slightly coronal compare to 21 but patient did not mind


ree

- Since patient is still in his 20s,

It is not a bad idea to leave the soft tissue a bit coronally in case of future recession

ree

- Emergence profile maintained and recorded with customized impression copping


ree

Final Impression


ree

Final Prosthesis

- Cementable UCLA abutment was used.


ree

- Excess cement removed from a duplicated die.



ree
ree
ree
ree

Final prosthesis Photograph


ree

Post-operative Panorama



Final Comparison (Before-After)



Discussion

- Literature review

- 8 Results by September 2016

- Only 3 animal histology study (HÜRZELER 2015, GUIRADO 2016)

- 1 Review paper

- 1 Retrospective study

- 2 Cases reports

- 1 Uncertain Dutch paper

- 0 Randomized clinical trial published


Standardization required for this technique

1. Separate the palatal root fragment or drill through the root?

2. How much thickness of root buccal-lingually?

3. How deep coronal-apical position of remaining root is tolerable?

4. Circumferential of labial root left behind <180 °, 180°, >180 ° ?

5. Need of bone graft for jumping distance

- Root canal treated tooth suitability of the case?

(dentine surface altered by NaOCl, Sealer material and Gutta percha)

- Application in multiple rooted teeth?

Conclusion

- Socket shielding technique could be an alternative technique to prevent buccal bone resorption

- Immediate Implant vs Socket Preservation vs Socket Shielding

- More long term data required

Comments


bottom of page