top of page

14-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Sinus Lift Surgery Using SCA Technique

  • Writer: GAO
    GAO
  • Aug 27, 2024
  • 3 min read

Updated: May 16, 2025

14-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Sinus Lift Surgery Using SCA Technique

Case Summary 🔎


Patient Information

  • Patient Information: 42 years old, Male

  • Medical History: Generally healthy, with normal blood pressure and no diabetes.

  • Chief Complaint(C.C): I want to have my removable denture changed to a fixed one.


Clinical Findings

  • Missing Teeth: #25, #26, #27

  • Residual Bone Heights: Approximately 10mm, 4mm, and 6mm, with a concave-shaped sinus floor.


Treatment Plan

  • Tooth #25: Class II CMI Fixation

  • Tooth #26: Class III CM Fixation with Crestal Bone Graft

  • Tooth #27: Class II or III Fixation

  • Prosthesis: Implant-supported 3-unit Fixed Partial Denture (FPD)


Case Presentation

1️⃣ Pre-Op

  • Pre-Op X-ray

Pre-Op X-ray

2️⃣ Surgery: Sinus Lifting Procedures

After serial drilling with twist drills, S-reamers, specifically designed for sinus lift surgery, were used at a minimum of 1200 rpm. The process started by drilling 1mm short of the sinus floor depth, and then continued up to the opening of the inferior wall of the sinus.


S-reamer size for each implant

  • Ø2.4mm for #25 for Class II fixation

  • Ø3.6mm for #26 for Class III fixation

  • Ø3.2mm for #27 for Class II fixation



A periapical view after placing EB type CMI implant (4.0X11.5). The apex of the implant was placed 1-2mm into the sinus without bone graft (Class II CMI fixation) at #25 area. Bone density was D332 with 40 Ncm, which may be the result of obtaining Class II fixation.

A periapical view after placing EB type CMI implant (4.0X11.5).

 At #26 area, the available bone height was 3-4mm. The micro-elevators of the SLA kit were used to elevate the maxillary sinus membrane through the crestal hole. This procedure can be done in case of limited bone height (1-3mm).



0.3cc of alloplastic bone graft material (Calpore) was inserted below the elevated Schneiderian membrane to fill about 5mm at the #26 area.

0.3cc of alloplastic bone graft material (Calpore) was inserted below the elevated Schneiderian membrane to fill about 5mm at the #26 area.

Two EB type CMI implants (5.0X8.5) were placed at the #26 and #27 areas. Insertion torques were 40 and 30 Ncm at #26 and #27 respectively. That amount of insertion torque might result from a combination of inferior cortical fixation and selfcompaction technique.

Two EB type CMI implants (5.0X8.5) were placed at the #26 and #27 areas.

Healing abutments were connected because of sufficient initial stabilities. Interrupted suture was performed with adequate attached gingiva.

Healing abutments were connected because of sufficient initial stabilities.

3️⃣ Post-Op

Panoramic view right after surgery. About 7mm height of grafting material at the #26 fixture was observed as domeshaped radiopaque mass. It was possible to obtain extensive elevation with the micro-elevator.

Panoramic view right after surgery

4️⃣ Post-Op Follow-Up

1 month after implant placement surgery. Good soft tissue healing was seen. Impression was made at this time.

1 month after implant placement surgery.

5️⃣ Final Prosthetics

A temporary cemented crown of #24 was removed. SCRP abutments were connected at #25, #26, and #27 one week after the impression.

A temporary cemented crown of #24 was removed.

A definitive SCR 3-unit PFM FPD (SCRP) was completed within 40 days after the surgery by cementing it on the abutments with a permanent resin cement. This prosthesis is retrievable through the screw holes.

A definitive SCR 3-unit PFM FPD (SCRP) was completed

  • After final prosthetics


  • Buccal view
  •  Frontal view

6️⃣ Final X-ray

  • After final prosthetics

    • Panoramic view at prosthesis delivery shows stable marginal bone and elevated bone graft material.

    • Periapical radiograph shows no cement remnants at prosthesis delivery, due to SCRP type prosthesis which can be removed and polished separately. Good marginal fit between abutments and FPD is observed.


  • Panoramic view
  • Periapical radiograph

7️⃣ Follow-Up

  • 3 year follow-up

A periapical view of 3 year follow-up. No specific difference was seen.

A periapical view of 3 year follow-up. No specific difference was seen.

  • 6 year follow-up

Panoramic view and a periapical view of 6 year follow-up. Peri-implant bone level is well maintained.


  • Panoramic view
  • Periapical radiograph

Occlusal view of the SCRP and CT images of #25, #26 and #27 implants at 6 year follow-up. Marginal bone levels were well maintained while 0.5mm of apices came out from the bone due to re-pneumatization, but were covered by the membrane. This may be a kind of bone remodeling phenomenon, explaining why no more bone is needed in the apex for occlusal support.


  • Occlusal view of the SCRP
  • CT images

  • 12 year follow-up

12 years later, during a follow-up, the prosthetic material had been changed from PFM to Zirconia, and the restoration was well-maintained with no signs of inflammation or marginal bone loss.


  • Intraoral Photo
  • Periapical radiograph

  • 14 year follow-up

Intraoral photo and panoramic view of 14-year follow-up show stable marginal bone.


  • Intraoral Photo
  • Periapical radiograph



 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page